Posts Tagged ‘North American Union’
SPP-NAU agenda: High Treason on Parliament Hill
Don’t let the Harper government and elite friends, make us surrender the affirmation of our national identity, as Canadians
Edited by Peter Tremblay
 |
||
|
|
The objective of the Stephen Harper minority government, is to continue to the “salami slicing” tactics started by Brian Mulroney, to of a public policy agenda, that will result in the step-by-step break down of our national soul as Canadians. The elite friends of the Harper government include apparent collaborators, like Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton, and Gilles Duceppe in other parts of the Political Establishment, and corporate elites who together, support Mr Harper’s pursuit of the North American Union (NAU) agenda of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP).
The genesis of Canada as an identifiable place, was in the 1530′s. Canada as a nation, would be further inspired by aboriginal peoples and settler immigrant groups who came together as ‘Canadiens’ along the St. Lawrence River.
Subsequent immigration from loyalists fleeing the American Revolution would support the genesis of a Canadian nationhood in the late eighteenth century, that sought to embrace a national ideal of “Peace, Order and Good Government”, that distinguished ourselves from the culture of violence in the United States. A culture of violence associated with the American constitutional “right to bear arms”, remains a prominent part of the American cultural milieu.
In contrast, Canadians also sought to develop an alternative national community in which Peace, Order and Good Government manifested in the creation of a mutualistic socially progressive society.
Canadians, sought the wisdom of government intervention in redressing conditions of economic disparity in our cities through innovative social policy, and also sought to create a universal public healthcare system, that would reflect the expression of a higher communitarian civic consciousness.
As a society which sought to spread corresponding messages of peace throughout the world, Canadians also sought peacekeeping responsibilities over militarism. Canadians sought to affirm greater independence from the United Kingdom, and then the United States, in a matter which would allow us as a nation to make a vital independent contribution in a community of independent and free nations.
The Harper government and friends through its NAU, SPP agenda, seek to deny us our very national self-determination. The Harper government, has in fact been pursuing an active U.S. assimilation agenda, through the NAU and SPP agenda that will totally destroy our national institutions, like the Canadian Wheat Board, and absorption into a American Big Business-friendly “cultural template”.
The result will be that the “errors” of American society that have led to the destruction of America’s cities, and to a general predatory “survival of the fittest society” will be imported into Canada. Indeed, homelessness and other worsening social despair in Canada, is the result of the dismantling of innovative Canadian social policy, which once included rent control and other programs.
The Harper government also seeks to use the pretext of a jingoistic “War of Terrorism”… [CONTINUED.. see comment below]
[BECOME A MEMBER, and get the rest of this article emailed to you. E-mail editorial@agoracosmopolitan.com to find out how you can become a member of The Canadian.]
North American Union agenda: Canada being sold out to Mexico and the U.S.
by Allison Wells
 |
|
As some of you may know, Canada is in the process of aligning its policies with those of the USA. Very quietly. Without public debate. It is all part of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP-NAU) signed in Waco, Texas, 2005. This is not a left-right issue — Martin signed the accord, Harper is ardently continuing it. This seems to be a corporate-driven venture.
What does SPP mean for Canadians?
We are in the process of adopting U.S. immigration, security and foreign policy. SPP also commits Canada to supporting U.S.-lead wars on terror and increased military spending. Our military is now led by USA’s NORTHCOM. We now have no-fly lists. We are likely to have to accept fingerprinting and other biometrics. We will be required to treat immigrants and refugees differently.
Our resources will be proportionally shared. Huge areas of the U.S. are short of water. Our government is currently moving toward bulk exporting of water. Oil export will increase (now 63%) due to ‘proportional sharing’.
Lowered environmental and health protection. NAFTA already allows corporations to sue our federal governments when their regulations stand in the way of profit. SPP allows corporations to sue provincial and municipal governments — which is where many safety standards rest.
Loss of democracy — it is intended that Canada, USA and Mexico will merge into a North American Union (NAU), having one currency, the Amero. The Union will be overseen by 10 non-elected corporate CEOs from each country.
Accelerating privatisation of health care and other public services.
We need to consider diverse implications of the SPP-NAU agenda, and their effects for future generations.
If this is new to you, you might consider educating yourself — and your friends and family. Canadians have a right to know what has been is planned for them.
About the writer:
Allison Wells is a writer with downtown Toronto’s The Bulletin.
The Bulletin is an independent community newspaper to inform residents, visitors and businesses in Downtown Toronto. LINK.
Featured LINK. Online dating. Alternative Lifestyles Personals. Free and Anonymous Membership
Join our social network and mailing list. Socialize Democracy and Exopolitics Network – Free Membership
British Columbia Perspective: My Vision of Canada as an alternative to assimilation into the U.S. Empire
by Gerry Masuda
Reading Whose Canada?: Continental Integration, Fortress North America and the Corporate Agenda edited by Grinspun and Shamsie, I read the corporate elites are creating a impression that North American Union (NAU) is urgent, inevitable and irreversible. Generally, the Canadian public is unaware of these pressures being brought to bear on our federal government.
As the push towards NAU become evident to the public, we will need some alternative vision of where we want Canada to develop into as an independent nation rather than be absorbed by the U.S. Empire.
I challenge each Canadian to develop his/her Vision of Canada which describes what he/she would like Canada to develop towards.
My vision follows.
My vision of Canada is a Canada which is proudly independent and controls its destiny with a strong national sense of purpose for the benefit of its citizens and the greater world community.
I want a country where social, economic and political justice prevails, where all the basic human needs are met and individuals focus their attention on achieving their greatest potential whatever that may be. I want a country where human rights and values are more important than the ‘rights of capital’ and the dehumanizing single value of the corporate bottom line.
I want a country where our children are our most valuable resource, where each child is encouraged to develop his/her abilities and interests. I want a Canada where child care is provided ‘free’ as are all levels of education (including university) based solely on ability and desire learn and to perform.
I want a country in which our heritage represented by our natural resources is used for the benefit of Canadians rather than the profit of private corporations. I want a country where our resources are used sustainably, rather than exploited for private commercial profit, in a mad rush to catch the last fish, to fall the last tree.
I also want a Canada where our natural wealth is used for the benefit of all Canadians (including Canadians not yet born) and the world rather than exploited for private commercial profit.
I want a Canada where the government legislates to meet the needs and desires of its people rather than corporate interests.
I want a Canada that I can be proud of, and which is held in high esteem by all other countries.
Featured LINK. Online dating. Alternative Lifestyles Personals. Free and Anonymous Membership
Join our social network and mailing list. Socialize Democracy and Exopolitics Network – Free Membership
NAU agenda is an attack against Canada’s national self-determination
Canadian nationalist Walter Gordon’s declaration that we have a right and “desire to run our own show” now resonates more than ever
Compiled by Anna Thomas
 |
||
|
While the leadership of the Conservatives, Liberals, NDP, and Bloc are trying their best to pretend in the House of Commons that Canada’s very national existence is not being negotiated away, Lou Dobbs before he retired from CNN, had continued to expose the North American Union (NAU) agenda. It was former Finance Minister and great Canadian nationalist Walter Gordon that said during a Toronto Star Forum held on 17 March 1970, that “the U.S. is an aggressive neighbour, interfering in Canada’s desire to left alone to run its own business.
The subject of that Forum was “The Americanization of Canada”. Having been taken over by a clique of multinational Big Business interests, it would be unthinkable for TorStar executives to ever even consider holding a Forum like that again presently. These days the Toronto Star has become mostly “fluff” journalism, with apologetic right wing spin, (as presented in that newspaper’s support for Canada adopting U.S. President Bush’s Star Wars Missile Defence Systems, and other areas) designed to appease the anti-democratic continentalist agenda of these interests.
Walter Gordon had said in his opening remarks to the well-attended and watershedToronto Star Forum that, “Canada has no ambitions to acquire more territory, or to interfere with other nations or their governments. This a tradition to which the current Stephen Harper government has sought to undermine, by supporting the current U.S. Bush administration pro-war agenda in the Middle East.
Mr. Gordon then elaborated that Canadian nationalism as non-belligerent and progressive compared to other forms of nationalism, “boils down to the fact that we would like to be left alone, to organize and conduct our own affairs as we see fit.” Mr. Gordon would likely be shocked at the complete capitulation of today’s Liberal Party of Canada under Stephane Dion, in apparent collusion with the elites of other political parties in Parliament.
Mr. Gordon further had remarked that Canadians would have to be “foolish to place ourselves in the hands of the Americans, or anyone else for that matter — especially when we do not have to.”
 |
 |
| Traitors among Us is a book for further reading on this subject. | |
 |
“Canadians have been equally foolish for allowing so many enterprises to have been acquired — mostly be enterprising Americans – over the last 25 years, ” he had continued.
“To suggest that it makes no difference who actually owns, and therefore controls these enterprises, indicates a remarkable lack of knowledge of the way in which businesses operate, and the way human nature ticks, ” he also had said.
Canada, he said “should announce a, “clear and positive policy to recover great control over the economy and then to apply it.”
“I would like to see this done before the only alternative left, ” which would be, “a widespread scheme of expropriation and nationalization of the kind advocated by the Radical Left,” he has added.
Canadian Political History Backgrounder
Walter Lockhart Gordon, PC, CC, FCA, LL.D (January 27, 1906 – March 25, 1987) was a Canadian politician and businessman.
Born in Toronto, he was educated at Upper Canada College and the Royal Military College in Kingston. Upon graduation, he joined the family accounting firm of Clarkson, Gordon and Company.
In the 1962 federal election, he was elected to the Canadian House of Commons as a Liberal. He was Minister of Finance from 1963 to 1965 and President of the Privy Council from 1967 to 1968 in the government of Prime Minister Lester Pearson. He was noted for his economic nationalism and his support for new social programs.
After leaving politics in 1968, he returned to business. He continued to argue for economic nationalist causes and in 1968, along with Peter C. Newman of the Toronto Star and economist Abraham Rotstein, founded the Committee for an Independent Canada (CIC).
Canadian historian Jack Granatstein argues in Yankee Go Home? that the CIC ‘helped to create the atmosphere in which Pierre Elliot Trudeau’s government established the Canada Development Corporation in 1971 to “buy back” Canada.’
Mr. Gordon became the Chancellor of York University.
According to Dr. Stephen Azzi, Walter Gordon is responsible for “New Nationalism” in Canada. This is the idea of supporting stronger ties with Britain to prevent Canada being absorbed by the United States.
In 1976, he was made a Companion of the Order of Canada.
Featured LINK. Online dating. Alternative Lifestyles Personals. Free and Anonymous Membership
North American Union manifesto demonstrates surprising ideological ties
by John O’reilly
 |
||
|
Big Business interests have had enough of wasting money on trying to influence elections, as well as on dealing with labour laws, human rights legislation, environmental protection, public healthcare, and on other quality-of-living issues. After all, isn’t democracy “over-rated”? Wouldn’t society be better if a Council of the most successful corporate entrepreneurs, and other elites controlled how matters evolve in a “survival of the fittest” oriented “North America”? This re-born North American inhabitant would be controlled by fear, that developed under a never-ending “terrorist” threat, requiring a perpetuated state of war.
Elites freed of labour laws, for example, could forge a vast industrial army of workers, who could sell their labour power “competitively”, for as low as possible, without corporations being restricted by “minimum wages”. Society would operate with “order”, under the purposeful control and direction of “wise men”, and the masses would know their place in this type of society. The masses, in the context of a new sense of ‘freedom’ would be “freed”, from being “confused”, by the operation of democracy in the U.S. or Canada.
The mantra of the envisaged new regime is that the largest corporations in Canada, the U.S., and Mexico, along with military interests, and a political clique, could do a much better job, if they formed a totalitarian-inspired government under the direction of “wise men”. Well, perhaps a couple of token positions can be reserved for women who “know their place”, and who do not challenge the “wise men”.
This totalitarianism for now, will be disguised as “freedom” and the protection of “liberty”, while North America is being transformed under the guidance of a Christian-driven political-military-industrial complex, away from the “hordes” of masses in what is now Canada, the U.S., and Mexico.
Indeed, thanks to “forward-thinking” men like former Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin, and current Prime Minister Stephen Harper, along with U.S. President George W. Bush, and Mexican leadership, we are now on a timetable to achieve a North American commercial paradise.
“Wise men” are pursuing a timetable to complete the creation of the North American Super-Capitalist state by 2010. However, it is apparently hoped by NAU advocates that another 9/11-like “terrorist attack” would be advantageous to help “convince” Canadians, Americans, and Mexicans, that their lives would be better being controlled under “Big Brother”, in a “Brave New World”.
A guiding principle of this “Brave New World”, is that ‘democracy’ weakens society, as affirmed by the writings of various “learned fascists”, like Leo Strauss. NAU will help support successful “white Aryan Christian wise men” (with the help of some Mexicans) being able to more quickly exploit North America’s natural and human resources, and to deal with the “Asian menace” of China and Japan, which threatens to displace “Aryan Supremacy”.
The NAU is one closer step toward a New World Order which will be achieved through a projected merger with Europe, that will unite the white race to stand against the “inferior mongrel races” that are currently in North America, including the “Islamists”, and other such races from across Africa to Asia.
See our NAU manifesto herein which was created by a “white brotherhood” of business leaders. These “wise men” have been executing an established timetable since 2005, to replace the current “inferior” form of democratic governments in Canada, the U.S., and Mexico, by no later than 2010:
NAU Aryan Nation Manifesto pdf file.
Featured LINK. Online dating. Alternative Lifestyles Personals. Free and Anonymous Membership
